Yam Production with or without Trellisingi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v5i1.54Keywords:
yam production, Dioscorea alata, cost and benefit analysis, trellising, stakingAbstract
A 72 m2 area in Don Martin Marundan, Mati, Davao Oriental was planted to pre-treated and pre-sprouted yam setts arranged in a randomized complete block design to compare the tuber yield and costs when yams are grown with or without trellis. On a 6 m2 area, mean tuber yields of non-trellised and trellised (single strand and double strands of tie wire tied on posts 6 m apart) were not significantly different. With computed tuber yields per hectare however, differences of up to 54 tons may easily be translated to profits. Bulbil yields represented from 16 to 27% of the total yield (tubers + bulbils). Cost and return analysis gave 13.7 and 24.9 % differences in profits when plants were trellised and yam tuber price per kilogram was pegged at P7.5C
Downloads
References
Bayot, A. J. (1994). Response of Ubi to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers Grown with and Without Trellis. The Phil. J. ofP1ant Industry. 59 (4): 81-90.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2002 Emma Ruth V. Bayogan, Necito A. Baldoz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
DRJ is an open-access journal and the article's license is CC-BY-NC. This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build on the author's work, as long as they give credit to the original work. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal/publisher non-exclusive publishing rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.